Although US Q1 2019 GDP growth surprised on the upside at 3.2% (q/q annualised), this was due to an improved trade surplus and higher inventories, short-term factors that masked drops in fundamentals like consumer and business spending, as well as weaker housing investment and declines in manufacturing and industrial production.
In April the IMF revised its 2019 global growth forecast down to 3.3% from 3.5% previously, as the EU, Japan and China also showed fundamental slowing despite some positive data. Additionally, one of the main risks to global growth prospects (also cited by the IMF) has been the escalating trade tensions between the US and China, which have already impacted growth (to a relatively small extent so far) but threaten to widen into a full-blown war which could further damage global expansion.
Aside from trade frictions, the slowdown is expected to be cushioned by the central bank response. The US Federal Reserve has paused its projected interest-hiking cycle, therefore keeping US interest rates lower for longer than investors had previously expected.
The European and Chinese central banks, meanwhile, have introduced new stimulus measures and the UK and Japan have continued with their easy monetary policies. These measures all helped to lift investor sentiment, buoying equity and bond markets alike.
Against this backdrop of “lower interest rates for longer”, the biggest opportunity we see globally is for investors to continue to take advantage of the high earnings yields investors can receive from global equities compared to bonds and cash.
There is a very high-risk premium built into many markets – substantially above historic norms – on the back of extraordinarily low government bond yields. It makes sense for investors to avoid cash and global government bonds, especially those in the UK, EU and Japan where yields remain at exceptionally low levels. US Treasury yields are more attractive, but still not appealing compared to those from equities.
Consequently, our house view portfolios are underweight global government bonds. We are instead holding US and European investment-grade corporate bonds. These assets are slightly cheap and have the potential to deliver stronger returns going forward now that the US interest rate hiking cycle is on hold. In contrast, we have not been holding high-yield corporate bonds as they are less attractive on a risk-adjusted basis.
Meanwhile, we are overweight in global equities as a whole given the very high risk premium available. Emerging markets and currencies have underperformed developed markets, and continue to be especially well valued on many measures. As such we are overweight selected emerging markets such as South Korea, Indonesia and China. We are also overweighting certain developed markets where equities are undervalued but fundamentals for earnings growth remain positive, including Germany, Italy and Japan.
Because the US market is relatively expensive and other markets offer better value, we are underweight US equities, but we are overweight US banks, which have underperformed the broader market.
Finally, we would also opt to be overweight global equities compared to South African equities in portfolios where total equity exposure is constrained, such as Multi-Asset Low-Equity Funds which are limited to 40%.
According to our valuation-based view, some other emerging markets are cheaper and offer better value than the local market, despite it also being valued attractively on an historic basis.
Looking ahead, global growth has good prospects for a “soft landing” thanks to the support of central banks around the world. The wild card is trade, where US-Chinese relations could deteriorate further. But investors should recognise that many global equity markets are currently priced to deliver attractive returns over the medium term, and take advantage of this opportunity rather than being discouraged by short-term factors.
To find out more, contact our Client Services Team on 0860 105 775 or email us at email@example.com.